From Dryden’s Handbook of Individual Therapy (Sage 2006)
Emmy van Deurzen
HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND DEVELOPMENT IN BRITAIN
The existential approach is first and foremost philosophical. It is concerned with the understanding of people’s position in the world and with the clarification of what it means to them to be alive. It is also committed to exploring these questions with a receptive attitude, rather than with a dogmatic one. The aim is to search for truth with an open mind and an attitude of wonder rather than to fit the client into pre-established frameworks of interpretation.
The historical background to this approach is that of 3,000 years of philosophy. Throughout the history of humankind people have tried to make sense of life in general and of their personal predicaments in particular. Much of the philosophical tradition is relevant and can help us to understand an individual’s position in the world. The philosophers who are especially pertinent are those whose work is directly aimed at making sense of human existence. But the philosophical movements that are of most importance and that have been directly responsible for the generation of existential therapy are phenomenology and existential philosophy.
The starting point of existential philosophy (see Warnock, 1970; Macquarrie, 1972; Mace, 1999; Van Deurzen and Kenward, 2005) can be traced back to the last century and the work of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Both were in conflict with the predominant ideologies of their time and committed to the exploration of reality as it can be experienced in a passionate and personal manner.
Kierkegaard (1813–55) protested vigorously against Christian dogma and the so-called ‘objectivity’ of science (Kierkegaard, 1941, 1944). He thought that both were ways of avoiding the anxiety inherent in human existence. He had great contempt for the way in which life was being lived by those around him and believed that truth could ultimately only be discovered subjectively by the individual in action. What was most lacking was people’s courage to take the leap of faith and live with passion and commitment from the inward depth of existence. This involved a constant struggle between the finite and infinite aspects of our nature as part of the difficult task of creating a self and finding meaning. As Kierkegaard lived by his own word he was lonely and much ridiculed during his lifetime.
Nietzsche (1844–1900) took this philosophy of life a step further. His starting point was the notion that God was dead (Nietzsche, 1961, 1974, 1986) and that it is up to us to re-evaluate existence in light of this. He invited people to shake off the shackles of moral constraint and to discover their free will in order to soar to unknown heights and learn to live with new intensity. He encouraged people not to remain part of the herd, but to dare stand out. The important existential themes of freedom, choice, responsibility and courage are introduced for the first time.
Husserl (1859–1938). While Kierkegaard and Nietzsche drew attention to the human issues that needed to be addressed, Husserl’s phenomenology (Husserl, 1960, 1962; Moran, 2000) provided the method to address them in a rigorous manner. He contended that natural sciences are based on the assumption that subject and object are separate and that this kind of dualism can only lead to error. He proposed a whole new mode of investigation and understanding of the world and our experience of it. Prejudice has to be put aside or ‘bracketed’, in order for us to meet the world afresh and discover what is absolutely fundamental and only directly available to us through intuition. If we want to grasp the essence of things, instead of explaining and analysing them we have to learn to describe and understand them.
Heidegger (1889–1976) applied the phenomenological method to under- standing the meaning of being (Heidegger, 1962, 1968). He argued that poetry and deep philosophical thinking can bring greater insight into what it means to be in the world than can be achieved through scientific knowledge. He explored human being in the world in a manner that revolutionizes classical ideas about the self and psychology. He recognized the importance of time, space, death and human relatedness. He also favoured hermeneutics, an old philosophical method of investigation, which is the art of interpretation. Unlike interpretation as practised in psychoanalysis (which consists of referring a person’s experience to a pre-established theoretical framework) this kind of interpretation seeks to under- stand how the person herself subjectively experiences something.
Sartre (1905–80) contributed many other strands of existential exploration, particularly in terms of emotions, imagination, and the person’s insertion into a social and political world. He became the father of existentialism, which was a philosophical trend with a limited life span. The philosophy of existence on the contrary is carried by a wide-ranging literature, which includes many other authors than the ones mentioned above.
There is much to be learned from existential authors such as Jaspers (1951, 1963), Tillich and Gadamer within the Germanic tradition and Camus, Marcel, Ricoeur, Merleau-Ponty and Levinas within the French tradition (see for instance Spiegelberg, 1972, Kearney, 1986 or van Deurzen-Smith, 1997). Few psychotherapists are aware of this literature, or interested in making use of it. Psychotherapy has traditionally grown within a medical rather than a philosophical milieu and is only just beginning to discover the possibility of a radical philosophical approach.
From the start of this century some psychotherapists were, however, inspired by phenomenology and its possibilities for working with people. Binswanger, in Switzerland, was the first to attempt to bring existential insights to his work with patients, in the Kreuzlingen sanatorium where he was a psychiatrist. Much of his work was translated into English during the 1940s and 1950s and, together with the immigration to the USA of Tillich (Tillich, 1952) and others, this had a con- siderable impact on the popularization of existential ideas as a basis for therapy (Valle and King, 1978; Cooper, 2003). Rollo May played an important role in this, and his writing (1969, 1983; May et al., 1958) kept the existential influence alive in America, leading eventually to a specific formulation of therapy (Bugental, 1981; May and Yalom, 1985; Yalom, 1980). Humanistic psychology was directly influenced by these ideas, but it invariably diluted and sometimes distorted their original meanings.
In Europe existential ideas were combined with some psychoanalytic principles and a method of existential analysis was developed by Boss (1957a, 1957b, 1979) in close co-operation with Heidegger. In Austria Frankl developed an existential therapy called logotherapy (Frankl, 1964, 1967), which focused particularly on finding meaning. In France the ideas of Sartre (1956, 1962) and Merleau-Ponty (1962) and of a number of practitioners (Minkowski, 1970) were important and influential but no specific therapeutic method was developed from them.
DEVELOPMENT IN BRITAIN
Britain became a fertile ground for the further development of the existential approach when Laing and Cooper took Sartre’s existential ideas as the basis for their work (Laing, 1960, 1961; Cooper, 1967; Laing and Cooper, 1964). Without developing a concrete method of therapy they critically reconsidered the notion of mental illness and its treatment. In the late 1960s they established an experimental therapeutic community at Kingsley Hall in the East End of London, where people could come to live through their madness without the usual medical treatment. They also founded the Philadelphia Association, an organization providing alternative living, therapy and therapeutic training from this perspective. The Philadelphia Association is still in existence today and is now commit- ted to the exploration of the works of philosophers such as Wittgenstein, Derrida, Levinas and Foucault as well as the work of the French psychoanalyst Lacan. It also runs a number of small therapeutic households along these lines. The Arbours Association is another group that grew out of the Kingsley Hall experiment. Founded by Berke and Schatzman in the 1970s, it now runs a training programme in psychotherapy, a crisis centre and several therapeutic communi- ties. The existential input in the Arbours has gradually been replaced with a more neo-Kleinian emphasis.
The impetus for further development of the existential approach in Britain has largely come from the development of a number of existentially based courses in academic institutions. This started with the programmes created by van Deurzen, initially at Antioch University in London and subsequently at Regent’s College, London and since then at the New School of Psychotherapy and Counselling, also in London. The latter is a purely existentially based training institute, which offers postgraduate degrees validated by the University of Sheffield and Middleses University. In the last decades the existential approach has spread rapidly and has become a welcome alternative to established methods. There are now a number of other, mostly academic, centres in Britain that provide training in existential coun- selling and psychotherapy and a rapidly growing interest in the approach in the voluntary sector and in the National Health Service.
British publications dealing with existential therapy include contributions by Jenner (de Koning and Jenner, 1982), Heaton (1988, 1994), Cohn (1994, 1997), Spinelli (1997), Cooper (1989, 2002), Eleftheriadou (1994), Lemma-Wright (1994), Du Plock (1997), Strasser and Strasser (1997), van Deurzen (1997, 1998, 2002); van Deurzen and Arnold-Baker (2005); van Deurzen and Kenward (2005). Other writers such as Lomas (1981) and Smail (1978, 1987, 1993) have published work relevant to the approach although not explicitly ‘existential’ in orientation. The journal of the British Society for Phenomenology regularly publishes work on existential and phenomenological psychotherapy. An important development was that of the founding of the Society for Existential Analysis in 1988, initiated by van Deurzen. This society brings together psychotherapists, psychologists, psychiatrists, counsellors and philosophers working from an existential perspective. It offers regular fora for discussion and debate as well as major annual conferences. It publishes the Journal of the Society for Existential Analysistwice a year. It is also a member of the International Federation for Daseinsanalysis, which stimulates international exchange between representa- tives of the approach from around the world. An international Society for Existential Analysis also exists.
Image of the person
The existential approach considers human nature to be open-minded, flexible and capable of an enormous range of experience. The person is in a constant process of becoming. I create myself as I exist and have to reinvent myself daily. There is no essential self, as I define my personality and abilities in action and in relation to my environment. This impermanence and uncertainty give rise to a deep sense of anxiety (Angst), in response to the realization of one’s insignificance, and simultaneous responsibility to have to create something in place of the emptiness we often experience. Everything passes and nothing lasts. We are never able to hold on to the present. We are always no longer or not yet what we would like to be. We find ourselves somewhere in the middle of the passing of time, grappling with the givens of the past and the possibilities of the future, without any sure knowledge of what it all means.
Existential thinkers seek to avoid restrictive models that categorize or label people. Instead they look for the universals that can be observed cross-culturally. There is no existential personality theory which divides humanity into types or reduces people to part components. Instead there is a description of the different levels of experience and existence with which people are inevitably confronted.
The way in which a person is in the world at a particular stage can be charted on this general map of human existence (Binswanger, 1963; Yalom, 1980; van Deurzen-Smith, 1984). One can distinguish four basic dimensions of human exis- tence: the physical, the social, the psychological and the spiritual. On each of these dimensions people encounter the world and shape their attitude out of their partic- ular take on their experience. Our orientation towards the world defines our reality. The four dimensions are obviously interwoven and provide a complex four- dimensional force field for our existence. We are stretched between a positive pole of what we aspire to on each dimension and a negative pole of what we fear.
On the physical dimension (Umwelt) we relate to our environment and to the givens of the natural world around us. This includes our attitude to the body we have, to the concrete surroundings we find ourselves in, to the climate and the weather, to objects and material possessions, to the bodies of other people, our own bodily needs, to health and illness and to our own mortality. The struggle on this dimension is, in general terms, between the search for domination over the elements and natural law (as in technology, or in sports) and the need to accept the limitations of natural boundaries (as in ecology or old age). While people generally aim for security on this dimension (through health and wealth), much of life brings a gradual disillusionment and realization that such security can only be temporary. Recognizing limitations can bring great release of tension.
On the social dimension (Mitwelt) we relate to others as we interact with the public world around us. This dimension includes our response to the culture we live in, as well as to the class and race we belong to (and also those we do not belong to). Attitudes here range from love to hate and from co-operation to competition. The dynamic contradictions can be understood in terms of acceptance versus rejection or belonging versus isolation. Some people prefer to with- draw from the world of others as much as possible. Others blindly chase public acceptance by going along with the rules and fashions of the moment. Otherwise they try to rise above these by becoming trendsetters themselves. By acquiring fame or other forms of power, we can attain dominance over others temporarily. Sooner or later we are, however, all confronted with both failure and aloneness.
On the psychological dimension (Eigenwelt) we relate to ourselves and in this way create a personal world. This dimension includes views about our character, our past experience and our future possibilities. Contradictions here are often experienced in terms of personal strengths and weaknesses. People search for a sense of identity, a feeling of being substantial and having a self. But inevitably many events will confront us with evidence to the contrary and plunge us into a state of confusion or disintegration. Activity and passivity are an important polarity here. Self-affirmation and resolution go with the former and surrender and yielding with the latter. Facing the final dissolution of self that comes with personal loss and the facing of death might bring anxiety and confusion to many who have not yet given up their sense of self-importance.
On the spiritual dimension (Überwelt) (van Deurzen-Smith, 1984) we relate to the unknown and thus create a sense of an ideal world, an ideology and a philosophical outlook. It is here that we find meaning by putting all the pieces of the puzzle together for ourselves. For some people this is done by adhering to the dogma of a religion or some other prescriptive worldview, for others it is about discovering or attributing meaning in a more secular or personal way. The contradictions that have to be faced on this dimension are often related to the tension between purpose and absurdity, hope and despair. People create their values in search of something that matters enough to live or die for, something that may even have ultimate and universal validity. Usually the aim is the conquest of a soul, or something that will substantially surpass mortality (as for instance in having contributed something valuable to humankind). Facing the void and the possibility of nothingness are the indispensable counterparts of this quest for the eternal.
CONCEPTUALIZATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTURBANCE AND HEALTH
Disturbance and health are two sides of the same coin. Living creatively means welcoming both. Well-being coincides with the ability to be transparent and open to what life can bring: both good and bad. In trying to evade the negative side of existence we get stuck as surely as we do when we cannot see the positive side. It is only in facing both positive and negative poles of existence that we generate the necessary power to move ahead. Thus well-being is not the naive enjoyment of a state of total balance given to one by Mother Nature and perfect parents. It can only be negotiated gradually by coming to terms with life, the world and one- self. It doesn’t require a clean record of childhood experience, or a total devotion to the cult of body and mind. It simply requires openness to being and to increasing understanding of what the business of living is all about. From an existential perspective psychological well-being is seen to be synonymous with wisdom. This results from being equal to the task of life when it is faced honestly and squarely. Psychological disturbance is seen as a consequence of either avoidance of truth or an inability to cope with it. Discontent is generated for many people through self-deception in a blind following of popular opinions, habits, beliefs, rules and reasons. Others are at a loss to make sense of the paradoxes of life that they are forcefully confronted with and that overwhelm them.
To be authentic is to be true to oneself and one’s innermost possibilities and limitations. Finding one’s own authority and learning to create an increasingly comfortable space inside and around oneself, no matter what the circumstances, is a considerable challenge. As the self is defined by its vital links to the world around it, being true to oneself has to be understood as being true to life. This is not about setting one’s own rules or living without regard for others. It is about recognizing the necessities, givens and limitations of the human condition as much as about affirming freedom and insisting on one’s basic rights. Many people avoid authentic living, because it is terrifying to face the reality of the constant challenges, failures, crises and doubts that existence exposes us to. Living authentically begins with the recognition of one’s personal vulnerability and mortality and with the acknowledgement of the ultimate uncertainty of all that is known. It is superficially far more rewarding to play at being certain, role- defined and self-important. Even the self-image of sickness or madness can seem more attractive than having to struggle with yourself and face your vulnerability in an uncertain world.
Ultimately it is the essential human longing for truth that redeems. We are reminded of truth by the pangs of conscience, which may expose our evasion of reality. A sense of courage and possibility can be found by stopping the dialogue with the internal voices of other people’s laws and expectations. In the quietude of being with myself I can sense where truth lies and where lies have obscured the truth. The call of conscience reaches me through a feeling of guilt, that is, existential guilt, which tells me that something is lacking, something is being owed to life by me: I am in debt to myself.
The call of conscience comes through an attitude of openness to possibilities and limitations. This openness leads to Angst as it exposes me to my responsibilities and possible failure, but when I accept this anxiety it becomes the source of energy that allows me to be ready for whatever the future holds in store. And so, in facing the worst, I prepare myself for the best. I can live resolutely only when I can also surrender and release myself. I can be free only when I know what is necessary. I can be fully alive only when I face up to the possibility of my death.
ACQUISITION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTURBANCE
When well-being is defined as the ability to face up to the disturbing facts of life, the notion of disturbance takes on a whole new meaning. Problems and obstacles are not necessarily an impediment to living well, for any potentially distressing situation can be seen as a challenge that can be faced. Problems are first of all problems in living and will occur at any stage in human development. In fact the only thing you can be sure of is that life will inevitably confront you with new situations that are a challenge to your established ways and evasions of the human paradox. When people are shocked out of their ordinary routine into a sudden awareness of their inability to face the realities of living, the clouds start to gather. Even though we may think of ourselves as well-adjusted people who have had a moderately acceptable upbringing, unexpected events, such as the death of a loved one, the loss of a job or another significant sudden exposure of our vulnerability, may still trigger a sense of failure, despair or extreme anxiety. Everything around us suddenly seems absurd or impossible and our own and other people’s motives are questioned. The value of what used to be taken for granted becomes uncertain and life loses its appeal. The basic vulnerability of being human has emerged from behind the well-guarded self-deception of social adaptation. Sometimes a similar disenchantment and profound disturbance arise not out of an external catastrophe but out of a sense of the futility of everyday routines. Boredom can be just as important a factor in generating disturbance as losses or other forms of crisis.
No matter how securely a person is established in the world some events will shake the foundations of that security and transform the appearance of existence. For some people, however, such false security is not at first available. They never achieve ‘ontological security’ (Laing, 1960), which consists of having a firm sense of one’s own and other people’s reality and identity. Genetic predisposition obviously makes some of us capable of greater sensory awareness and psychological susceptibility than others. People who have such extraordinary sensitivity may easily get caught up in the conflicts that others are trying to avoid. If they are exposed to particularly intense contradictions (as in certain family conflicts) they may fall into a state of extreme confusion and despair and withdraw into the relative security of a world of their own creation. Both the ontologically secure person who is disturbed by a crisis (or boredom) and the ontologically insecure person who is overwhelmed by the less pleasant sides of ordinary human existence are struggling with an absence of the usual protective armour of self-deception. Life is suddenly seen in all its harshness and paradoxical reality. Without the redeeming factor of some of the more positive aspects of life such realism can be distressing.
This does not mean that this kind of crisis or generation of anxiety should be avoided. It can be faced and integrated by making sense of it. The existential view of disturbance is that it is an inevitable and even welcome event that every- one will sooner or later encounter. The question is not how to avoid it but on the contrary how to approach it with determination and curiosity.
Perpetuation of psychological disturbance
Problems start to become more serious when the challenge of disturbance is not faced but evaded. Then a self-perpetuating negative spiralling downward can happen which leads to confusion and chaos. This is most likely to occur if we are not linked to a vital support system. As long as our family or other intimate networks of reference are strong and open enough to absorb the contradictions in which we get caught up, distress can be eased and overcome: the balance can be redressed. But if we find ourselves in isolation, without the understanding and challenge of a relative, a partner or a close friend, it is easy to get lost in our problems. Society’s rituals for safeguarding the individual are these days less and less powerful and secure. Few people gain a sense of ultimate meaning or direction from their relationship to God or from other essential beliefs. Many feel at the mercy of temporary, ever-changing but incessant demands, needs and desires. In time of distress there seems all too often to be nowhere to turn. Relatives and friends, who themselves are barely holding their heads above water, may be unavailable. If they are available, they may want to soothe distress instead of tackling it at the root. Spiritual authority has gradually been eroded and has been replaced with scientific authority, which is unable to address moral or spiritual dilemmas. It is hardly surprising that people turn increasingly to psychotherapists or counsellors. Unfortunately, there is little evidence that psy- chotherapy and counselling are able to lessen distress. To some extent a reliance on therapeutic cure may present another perpetuation of disturbance, as long as the basic existential issues are not dealt with and the client is kept in a passive role.
Paradoxically, the institutions in our society often seem to encourage the very opposite of what they are supposed to be about. When the family becomes a place of loneliness and alienation instead of one that fosters togetherness and intimacy, when schools become places of boredom and reluctance instead of inspiring curiosity and learning and when doctors’ surgeries become places of dependence and addiction instead of centres of healing and renewal of strength, it is time for essentials to be reconsidered. Much disturbance is not only generated but also maintained by a society that is out of touch with the essential principles of life. Often it is in the distress of those who face a crisis that the disturbance of society is expressed. It is therefore hardly surprising that we are inclined to want to obliterate this reminder of failings at the heart of our own existence. If we are willing to attend to the message of such distress we give our- selves a chance to be reminded of the ways in which we perpetuate our own mis-understanding and avoidance of life.
Life is one long process of change and transformation. Although people often think they want to change, more often than not their lives reflect their attempts at maintaining the status quo. As a person becomes convinced of the inevitability of change she may also become aware of the many ways in which she has kept such change at bay. Almost every minute of the day people make small choices that together determine the direction of their life. Often that direction is embarked upon passively: people just conform to their own negative or mediocre predictions of the future. But once insight is gained into the possibility of reinterpreting a situation and opting for more constructive predictions a change for the better may come about. This requires the person to learn to live deliberately instead of by default, and it can only be achieved by first becoming aware of how one’s daily attitude and frame of mind is set to a form of automatic functioning that keeps one repeating the same mistakes.
It is not easy to break the force of habit, but there are always times when habits are broken by force. Crises are times when old patterns have to be revised and when changes for the better can be initiated. This is why existential therapists talk about a breakdown as a possible breakthrough and why people often note with astonishment that the disaster they tried so hard to avoid was a blessing in disguise. In times of crisis the attention is refocused on where priorities lie so that choices can be made with more understanding than previously.
Whether such an event is self-imposed (as in emigration or marriage) or not (as in natural disasters or bereavement) it has the effect of removing previously taken for granted securities. When this happens it becomes more difficult for us to obscure the aspects of existence that we would rather not think about, and we are compelled to reassess our own attitudes and values. In the ensuing chaos we must make choices about how to proceed and how to bring new order into our lives. If we can tolerate the uncertainty of such situations instead of fleeing towards a new routine, such times can be an opportunity for rectifying life’s direction.
Once a crisis has been faced in such a constructive manner it becomes easier to be open to change at other times as well. People can learn to re-evaluate their values and reassess their priorities continually, thus achieving a flexibility and vitality that allows them to make the most of life’s naturally transformative character. Many people dread change and hide from it but they have to face it at a time of crisis. Existential therapy can be particularly helpful in those circumstances.
Goals of therapy
The goals of existential therapy are to enable people to:
- take stock of their situation, their values and beliefs;
- successfully negotiate and come to terms with past, present and future crises;
- become more truthful with themselves;
- widen their perspective on themselves and the world around them;
- find clarity on what their purpose in life is and how they can learn from the past to create some-
thing valuable and meaningful to live for;
- understand themselves and others better and find ways of effectively communicating and
being with others;
- make sense of the paradoxes conflicts and dilemmas of their, existence.
The word ‘authenticity’ is often used to indicate the goal of becoming true to oneself and therefore more real. This is a much-abused term, which misleadingly suggests that there is a true self; whereas the existential view is that self is relationship and process – not an entity or substance. Authenticity can also become an excuse for people who want to have their cake and eat it. Under the aegis of authenticity anything can be licensed: crude egoism may very well be the con- sequence. In fact, authenticity can never be fully achieved. It is a gradual process of self-understanding, but of the self as it is created in one’s relationships to the world on all levels. Helping people to become authentic therefore means assisting them in gaining a greater understanding of the human condition, so that they can respond to it with a sense of mastery, instead of being at its mercy. To be authentic means to face one’s human limitations and possibilities.
The task of the therapist is to have attained sufficient clarity and openness to be able to venture along with any client into murky waters and explore (without getting lost) how this person’s experience fits into a wider map of existence. Clients are guided through the disturbances in which they are caught and are helped to examine their assumptions, values and aspirations, so that a new direction can be taken. The therapist is fully available to this exploration and will often be changed in the process. The poignancy of each new adventure over the dangerous ground of life requires the therapist to become aware of previously unrecognized aspects of life. Therapy is a journey that client and therapist embark upon together. Both will be transformed, as they let themselves be touched by life.
Clients who come specifically for existential therapy usually already have the idea that their problems are about living, and are not a form of pathology. This basic assumption must be acceptable to clients if they are to benefit from the approach. A genuine commitment to an intense and very personal philosophical investigation is therefore a requirement. A critical mind and a desire to think for oneself are an advantage. People who want another’s opinion on what ails them and who would prefer symptom relief to a search for meaning might be better referred to other forms of therapy.
The approach is especially suitable for people who feel alienated from the expectations of society or for those seeking to clarify their personal ideology. The approach is relevant to people living in a foreign culture, class or race, as it does not dictate a specific way of looking at reality. It also works well with people confronting adversity in their lives or who are trying to cope with changes of personal circumstances (or want to bring those about). Bereavement, job loss or biological changes (in adolescence, middle age or old age) are a prime time for the reconsideration of the rules and values one has hitherto lived by. Generally speaking the existential approach is more helpful to those who question the state of affairs in the world, than to those who prefer the status quo. This approach seems to be most right for those at the edge of existence: people who are dying or contemplating suicide, people who are just starting on a new phase of life, people in crisis, or people who feel they no longer belong in their surroundings. It is less relevant for people who do not want to examine their assumptions and who would rather not explore the foundation of human existence.
Even though existential work consists in gaining understanding through talking, the client’s level of verbal ability is not important. Very young children or people who speak a foreign language will often find that the simpler their way of expressing things, the easier it becomes to grasp the essence of their worldview and experience. The approach is not about intellectualizing, but about verbalizing the basic impressions, ideas, intuitions and feelings a person has about life.
The existential approach can be applied in many different settings: individual, couple, family or group. When it involves more than one person at a time, the emphasis will be on clarifying the participants’ perceptions of the world and their place in it, in order to encourage communication and mutual understanding. The focus is always on the individual’s experiences and relationships. A dimension of existential exploration can easily be added to almost any other approach to psychotherapy, but it will soon be found that this makes a re-evaluation of one’s method necessary. Many of the more directive or prescriptive forms of therapy are in flagrant contradiction of existential principles. Interpretative methods such as psychoanalysis or analytical psychology betray the existential rule of openness to the different meanings that emerge for individuals. In the final analysis existential work requires a commitment to a philosophical investigation, which necessitates its own guidelines and parameters.
QUALITIES OF EFFECTIVE THERAPISTS
Good existential therapists combine personal qualities with accomplishment in method, but on balance it is more important that they have strength of character as people than that they have a high level of skill. Qualities can be described as falling into four categories: (a) life experience, (b) attitude and personality, (c) theoretical knowledge, (d) professional training.
Existential therapists will be psychologically and emotionally mature as human beings. This maturity will manifest itself in an ability to make room in oneself for all sorts of, even contradictory, opinions, attitudes, feelings, thoughts and experiences. They will be open-minded about the many different facets of human living. Rather than clinging to one point of view, existential therapists will be capable of overseeing reality from a wide range of perspectives. They will also be able to tolerate the tension that such awareness of contradictions generates. There are a number of life experiences that appear to be particularly helpful in preparing people for such maturation and broad-mindedness. Cross- cultural experience is an excellent way to stretch the mind and one’s views on what it means to be human. People who have permanently had to adjust their whole way of perceiving and dealing with the world (especially when this includes a change of language) have had the all-important experience of ques- tioning previous assumptions and opening up to a new culture and perspective.
Raising a family, or caring for dependants in a close relationship, is another invaluable source of life experience relevant to creating an open attitude. Many women have great practical experience in this area. Their life experience can become one of the building blocks of the kind of maturity needed to become an existential therapist.
The experience of having been immersed in society from several angles, in different jobs, different academic studies, different social classes and so on, is a definite advantage. The existential therapist is likely to be someone who has lived seriously and intensely in a number of ways and not just through the caring professions. People opting for psychotherapy as a second career are often especially suitable. Finally, the sine qua nonof becoming an existential therapist is to have negotiated a number of significant crossroads in one’s personal life. Existential therapists will have had their share of existential crises. Of course they will also have had to develop their ability to deal with these satisfactorily, so that their own lives were enriched rather than impoverished by the experience. Although all this maturity conjures up the image of someone advanced in age, it must be noted that maturity is not always commensurate with years. Some young people may have weathered greater storms than their elders and, what is more, may have lived their relatively shorter lives with greater intensity, maturing into fuller human beings.
Attitude and personality
Existential therapists should be capable of critical consideration of situations, people and ideas. They are serious, but not heavy-handed, downtrodden or cynical. They can be light-hearted, hopeful and humorous about the human condition, whilst intensely aware of the tragic poignancy of much of existence. They should be capable of self-reflection, recognizing the manner in which they them- selves represent the paradoxes, ups and downs, strengths and weaknesses that people are capable of. They should have a genuine sense of curiosity and a strong urge to find out what it means to be human. They should be capable of sustaining an attitude of wonder. Existential therapists will now and then abandon psychological theory altogether and reach for poetry, art or religion instead. They will tend to be quite personal in their way of working. Before anything else they must demonstrate their ability to tolerate experiences of anxiety and despair without faltering and without succumbing.
A basic working knowledge of philosophy, that is of the controversies and perspectives that the human race has produced over the centuries, is more useful to this approach than any other kind of knowledge. Included in this would be a familiarity with the history of psychology and psychoanalysis and a wide study of the many different approaches to psychotherapy that have been developed over the years. This will provide a map of different views on human nature, health and illness, happiness and unhappiness, which again will train and broaden the mind and personal outlook of the therapist. In addition a practical knowledge of human interaction and the dynamics of the therapeutic relation- ship is essential.
The existential therapist needs the kind of training that an eclectic therapist needs: a generic one. But instead of borrowing bits and pieces of technique from each to produce a complex amalgam, essentials are distilled and applied within a consistent philosophical framework. Specific skills of dialectical interaction can then be developed. Training should consist of a significant amount of therapeutic work under supervision and of self-reflection and analysis. Here again it is the quality that will be judged instead of the quantity. Numbers of hours of individual and group therapy are irrelevant. Some people will not reach the necessary perspective and depth with any amount of therapy. Others will be well ahead by having engaged in a discipline of self-reflection for years. The degree of readiness usually becomes obvious in supervision sessions, for one’s response to other people’s troubles is an excellent test of one’s own attitude to life and level of self-knowledge. Existential training will enable therapists to think creatively about complex human dilemmas.
THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP AND STYLE
It is important for the existential therapist to have a flexible attitude towards therapeutic style. Not only do different therapists interpret the approach in diverse ways, but clients also have their own individual requirements, which may vary over time. The existential therapist is ready and willing to shift her stance when the situation requires this. In a sense this variability is characteristic of the existential therapeutic style.
There are, of course, common features running through all of this. All existential therapists, for example, strive to recognize and question their preconceptions and prejudices as much as possible in their work. There is also a consistent appreciation of the unique situation of the client. The existential therapist strives to take the dilemmas of the client seriously – eschewing recourse to diagnoses and solutions. This seriousness includes openness and wonder as essential attributes of the existential attitude and does not preclude humour when appropriate.
Existential therapists are fundamentally concerned with what matters most to the client. He or she avoids making normative judgements, and renounces any ambition to, even implicitly, push the client in any particular direction. The attitude is non-directive, but not directionless. The client is assisted in finding his or her own perspective and position in the world in relation to the parameters and limits of human existence. At times the therapist might facilitate the client’s investigations through an attitude of relative passivity and silent intervention. At other times active dialogue and debate are required. On such occasions the therapist intervenes to point out contradictions in or implications of the client’s avowed point of view. The use of confrontation to offer opinions or moral evaluations of the client is not consistent with the existential attitude. The existential therapist resists the temptation to try and change the client. The therapy is an opportunity for the client to take stock of her life and ways of being in the world. Nothing is gained from interfering with these. The client is simply given the space, time and understanding to help her come to terms with what is true for her. What she wants to do with this afterwards is up to her. The therapist does not teach or preach about how life should be lived, but lets the client’s personal taste in the art of living evolve naturally within the context of existential and social constructions.
The only times when the therapist does follow a didactic line is when she reminds the client of aspects of a problem that have been overlooked. She gently encourages the client to notice a lack of perspective, think through consequences and struggle with contradictions. She puts forward missing links and underlying principles. The therapist never does the work for the client but makes sure that the work gets done. The client’s inevitable attempts to shirk and flee from the task in hand are reflected on and used as concrete evidence of the client’s attitude to life. The same can be said of the actual encounter between the client and the therapist, which is also reflected on and seen as evidence of the client’s usual ways of relating.
Generally speaking the therapeutic style follows a conversational pattern. Issues are considered and explored in dialogue. The rhythm of the sessions will follow that of the client’s preoccupations – faster when emotions are expressed and slower when complex ideas are disentangled. Existential therapists need to learn to allow clients to take the amount of space and time in this conversation that they need in order to proceed at their own pace. Existential therapists create sufficient room for the client to feel that it is possible to unfold their troubles.
Existential sessions are usually quite intense, since deep and significant issues often emerge. Moreover, the therapist is personally engaged with the work and is willing to be touched and moved by the client’s conflicts and questions. The human dilemmas expressed in the therapeutic encounter have as much relevance to the therapist as to the client. This commonality of experience makes it possible for client and therapist to work together as a team, in a co-operative effort to throw light on human existence. Every new challenge in the client’s experience is grist for the mill. The therapeutic relationship itself brings many opportunities to grasp some- thing of the nature of human interaction. The therapist, in principle, is ready to consider any past, present or future matter that is relevant to the client. The therapist is constantly aware of her own bias in approaching the client’s difficulties and aims to recognize it sufficiently for it not to interfere with the work on the client’s bias.
MAJOR THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES AND TECHNIQUES
The existential approach is well known for its anti-technique orientation. It prefers description, understanding and exploration of reality to diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Existential therapists will not generally use particular techniques, strategies or skills, but they will follow a specific philosophical method of enquiry, which requires a consistent professional attitude. This method and attitude may be interpreted in various ways, but it usually includes some or all of the following ingredients.
Cultivating a naive attitude
By consistently meeting the client with an open mind and in the spirit of exploration and discovery a fresh perspective on the world will emerge. This requires a great deal of intellectual discipline on the part of the therapist, who continuously has to observe and question her own prejudice and bias.
Themes: clear themes will run through the apparently confused discourse of the client. The therapist listens for the unspoken links that are implicit in what is said. When the theme is obvious and has been confirmed several times, the client’s attention can be drawn to it. Personal myths and stories are recognized and beliefs and fantasies about the world unveiled. Existential work enables people to create more satisfactory life narratives (Tantam, 2002).
Assumptions: much of what the client says will be based on a number of basic assumptions about the world. Generally people are unaware of these. Clarifying implicit assumptions can be very revealing and may throw new light on a dilemma. Every statement we make reveals our assumptions, and therapists need to make sure these become explicit.
Vicious circles: many people are caught up in self-fulfilling prophecies of doom and destruction without realizing that they set their own low standards and goals. Making such vicious circles explicit can be a crucial step forward. Self- fulfilling prophecies can become positive instead of negative.
Meaning: often people assume that they know what they mean when they talk about something. But the words they use can hide, even from themselves, the significance of what they mean. By questioning the superficial meaning of the client’s words and asking her to think again of what she wants to express, a new awareness may be brought about.
Values: people live their lives by standards and principles that establish values which they often take for granted and of which they are only dimly aware. Getting clarity about what makes life worth living and which aspects of life are most important and deserve making sacrifices for is a key step towards finding one’s sense of direction and purpose.
As the existential approach is essentially concerned with the need to face the limitations of the human condition, the therapist will be alert for opportunities to help the client identify these. This means facing up to ultimate concerns, such as death, guilt, freedom, isolation, meaninglessness, etc.
Self-deception: much of the time we pretend that life has determined our situation and character so much that we have no choices left. Crises may provide us with proof to the contrary. The safe crisis of the therapeutic interaction is a suitable place for rediscovering opportunities and challenges that had been forgotten.
Existential anxiety: the anxiety that indicates one’s awareness of inevitable limitations and death is also a dizziness in the face of freedom and a summoning of life energy. Existential anxiety is the sine qua non of individual awareness and full aliveness. Some people have dulled their sensitivity so as to avoid the basic challenges of life, others are overwhelmed by them and yet others have found ways of disguising them. Optimal use of anxiety is one of the goals of existential work. The therapist will recognize the client’s existential anxiety and will assist in finding ways of living with it constructively.
Existential guilt: the sense of being in debt to life and owing it to oneself to accomplish certain task before it is can give us, too late insight into our limitations and priorities. Therapists watch for existential guilt hidden in various disguises (such as anxiety, boredom, depression or even apparent self-confidence).
Consequences: clients are sometimes challenged to think through the consequences of choices, both past and future. In facing the implications of one’s actions it becomes necessary to recognize limitations as well as possibilities.
Some choices become easier to make; others become less attractive. Existential therapy does not condone the clients’ tendency to want only support and acceptance and wallow in a sense of their own suffering; it encourages clients to confront their own responsibilities in relation to the world, other people and themselves.
Paradoxes: in helping the client to become more authentic the concept of paradox can be of great help. If people are inclined to evade the basic human dilemma of life and death and contradictions that flow from it, their self- affirmation may look more like egocentricity. Checking that a person is aware of her capacity for both life and death, success and failure, freedom and necessity, certainty and doubts, allows one to remain in touch with a fundamental search for truth.
Exploring personal world view
The existential approach is open to all of life’s dimensions, tasks and problems, and the therapist will in principle explore together with the client all information that the latter brings along. It is essential to follow the client’s lead and under- stand her particular take on the world.
The fourfold world: using the model of four dimensions of existence discussed earlier it becomes possible to listen to the client’s account of herself as revealing her preoccupations with particular levels of her existence. A systematic analysis of how the client expresses her relationship to the physical, social, psychological and spiritual dimensions of her world can provide much insight into imbalance, priorities and impasses. An impression can be formed of where on the whole territory of human existence the client is struggling for clarity. Intuitions, feelings, thoughts, sensations, dreams and fantasies are all grist for the mill.
Dreams: listening to dreams with this model in mind can be extremely enlightening. The dream is seen as a message of the dreamer to herself. The dream experience reflects the dreamer’s attitudes on the various dimensions of existence and the client’s dream existence and world relations in it are considered as concrete as those of waking life.
Of course the same applies to the fantasies or stories that the client reports. Each of these is a miniature picture of the way in which she relates to the world and much can be learned from examining them carefully.
Questioning: exploring the client’s worldview is an ongoing enterprise and it is best done with an observation-orientated attitude. Questions are often asked in order to check whether a certain event or situation is seen in a particular light. Existential therapists will make observations and inferences and elicit further material that will either confirm or disconfirm hypotheses. The therapist draws the client’s attention to what seems to be the case. Sometimes an enquiry might be made in order to clarify a perception, along the lines of an exploration: ‘What makes this so important to you?’, or ‘What is this like for you?’, or ‘What does it mean to you?’ The question never suggests a solution or judges right or wrong, but investigates the client’s personal opinion and inclination. Initial explanations will almost always be questioned and explored in greater depth.
Enquiring into meaning
All investigations eventually lead to a greater understanding of what makes the world meaningful to the client. The idea is to assist the client in finding purpose and motivation, direction and vitality. In the process a number of irrelevant and misleading motivations may be encountered and eliminated. Quite often new interpretations of past or present events are arrived at, altering the client’s orien- tation to life and the future.
Emotions: feelings are of great help in this process. Understanding the meaning of one’s emotions and moods and the message they contain in terms of what one aspires to or is afraid to lose is of crucial help in finding the pattern of purpose currently at work. Each emotion has its own significance (van Deurzen, 2002) and the whole range of the emotional spectrum can be used as a compass in indicating one’s direction in life. Emotions like shame, envy and hope are indicators of values that are still missing but implicitly longed for. Love, joy and pride are within the range of emotions that indicate a sense of ownership of what is valued. Whereas jealousy and anger express an active response to the threat that what is valued may be lost, fear and sorrow come with the giving up and eventual loss of what really mattered.
Beliefs: all observations on the client’s preoccupations lead to a picture of her opinions, beliefs and values. It is important to extract these respectfully. Nothing can be gained from opposing the client’s values with an alternative set of values. It is the client’s conscience that has to be uncovered and revitalized. If deeply held values are contested or criticized conformity will be encouraged rather than reliance on an inner sense of purpose. Light is thrown on the ways in which personal beliefs may fail to take into account wider implications for others. This will expand the system of beliefs into something that can encompass the facts of life and a broader frame of reference.
Talents: many talents, abilities and assets will have been hidden by the client’s preoccupation with what is wrong with her. The therapist will attend to these and strive to draw attention to the wisdom and strength that are lying fallow. Often it is useful for the therapist to build on the example of the client’s abilities as they come to the fore and use them as the point of reference for further understanding.
Recollection: memories will be seen as malleable and open to new interpretation. While clients often set out with fixed views of their past they discover the possibility of reconsidering the same events and experiences in different ways. It is essential to encourage clients to discover how they influence their future with their own version of the past and how it is within their power to re-collect themselves in new ways, thereby opening new vistas. When the client realizes that she is the ultimate source of the meaning of her life, past, present and future, living is experienced as an art rather than a duty.
THE CHANGE PROCESS IN THERAPY
The aim of existential therapy is not to change people but to help them to come to terms with the transformative process of life. The assumption is that when people do face reality they are likely to find a satisfactory way forward. People are often hurried and under the impression that they can speed life up and force great rewards out of it with relatively little effort. One of the aims of existential therapy is to enable people to stop deceiving themselves about both their lack of responsibility for what is happening to them and their excessive demands on life and themselves. Learning to measure one’s distress by the standards of the human condition relieves pressure and at the same time pro- vides a clearer ideological basis for making sense of personal preoccupations and aspirations. Clients change through existential therapy by gradually taking more and more of life’s ups and downs in their stride. They can become more steadfast in facing death, crises, personal shortcomings, losses and failures if they accept the reality of constant transformation that we are all part of. They can find ways of tuning into these changes, instead of fighting them or trying to speed them up.
In other words they can acquire a measure of wisdom in learning to distinguish between the things they can change and those they cannot change. They can come to terms with the givens and find the courage to tackle the uncertain- ties. They can find out what matters enough to them to be committed to it, live for it and ultimately perhaps even die for it.
As they are constantly reminded to do their own thinking on these issues, people can learn to monitor their own actions, attitudes and moods. The therapy gives clients an opportunity to rediscover the importance of relating to them- selves and taking time for contemplation and recreation. Existential therapy teaches a discipline for living which consists of a frequent process of checking what one’s attitude, inclination, mood and frame of mind are, bringing them back in line with reality and personal aspirations.
Change is initiated in the sessions, but not accomplished in them. The process of transformation takes place in between the sessions and after therapy has terminated. The therapeutic hour itself can never be more than a small contribution to a person’s renewed engagement with life. It is only a kind of rehearsal for life. The change process is never-ending. As long as there is life there will be change. There is no place for complacency or a self-congratulatory belief in cure.
As existential therapy has no criterion for cure, it could in theory be an end- less process. To make sure it does not become this, the criterion for finishing a series of sessions is simply to stop when the client feels ready to manage on her own again. To encourage such self-reliance, relatively short-term therapy is encouraged (three months to two years), though sometimes the process will take a little longer.
LIMITATIONS OF THE APPROACH
The emphasis that the existential approach places on self-reflection and under- standing can lead to certain limitations. The approach often attracts clients who feel disinclined to trust other human beings because they perceive the existential approach as leaving them in total control. This limitation can only be overcome by a therapist who neither fights the need nor leaves it unchallenged, but who assists the client in turning such self-reliance to a positive end.
The approach is also often misconstrued as ‘intellectual’. Some existential therapists tend to emphasize the cognitive aspect of their clients’ preoccupations and some clients are attracted to the approach with the hope of avoiding senses, feeling and intuition. A good existential therapist would heed all these different levels of experience, as full self-understanding can be achieved only through openness to all different aspects of being. Nevertheless the emphasis on self- reflection remains central and the criticism is therefore a valid one to some degree.
The practical limitations of the approach have already been referred to in the section on selection criteria. As the approach does not stress the illness–health dimension, people who directly want to relieve specific symptoms will generally find the existential approach unsuitable though they may cover that symptoms tend to disappear when these fundamental life issue are addressed.
The existential therapist neither encourages the client to regress to a deep level of dependency nor seeks to become a significant other in the client’s life and nurture the client back to health. The therapist is a consultant who can provide the client with a method for and systematic support in facing the truth, and in this sense is there to allow the client to relate to herself more than to the therapist. This might be considered a limitation of the approach by clients who wish to regress and rely on the therapist as a substitute parental figure. Good existential therapists obviously enable the client to confront that issue just as bravely as any other issue and come through with greater self- understanding.
Perhaps the most absolute limitation is that of the level of maturity, life experience and intensive training that is required of practitioners in this field. It should be clear from the above that existential therapists are required to be wise and capable of profound and wide-ranging understanding of what it means to be human. The criteria of what makes for a good existential therapist are so high that the chances of finding bad existential therapists must be considerable.
One can imagine the danger of therapists pretending to be capable of this kind of wisdom without actual substance or inner authority. Little would be gained by replacing technological or medical models of therapy, which can be concretely learned and applied by practitioners, with a range of would-be existential coaches who are incapable of facing life’s problems with dignity and creativity themselves. The only way around this is to create training organizations that select candidates extremely carefully on personal qualities and experience before putting them through a thorough training and a long period of intensively supervised work.
Jerry R. enters my consulting room with a combination of confidence and coyness. He immediately strikes me as a young man with more than his fair share of gravitas, which he somehow seems to carry as a burden. With great aplomb he pauses to shake my hand and introduce himself. I indicate an armchair by the fire and invite him to take a seat. Before sitting down, he carefully folds his raincoat and places it over another chair, glancing at me sideways, checking for approval. Every gesture is made with precision and attention to detail. He unbuttons his smart black jacket and crosses his legs, exposing perfectly matched blue socks and shirt. He wears pristine black patent leather shoes, which he taps gently in rhythm with his words. His appearance is handsome and he carries his rather sultry Mediterranean looks with self-assurance. He brushes a lock of wavy black hair off his forehead with panache and poses both elbows on the armrests of his seat, folding his hands into a neat dome; index fingers pressed firmly together pointing upwards. He retains this posture with great poise and dignity for at least ten minutes. His manner is polite and friendly. He smiles hesitantly with one corner of his mouth when I ask him what brings him to my practice. When he speaks it is to express his hesitance in coming to see me upon his solicitor’s recommendation and his voice is sophisticated and melodious. I encourage him to give me some background in spite of his doubts about therapy and without much further prompting he provides me with a full and systematic picture of his life.
He tells me again that his name is Jerry R. (and he puts great emphasis on his last name as if I ought to recognize it). He is a single man of thirty-two. He was born in Paris, but raised in London where his father is an executive director for a large French company. He confirms that both his parents are French though he now has dual nationality himself. When I remark that his name sounds English, he blushes unexpectedly and explains that he is really called Jerôme and that he has adopted a more English sounding name in order to fit in with his peers. I say affirmatively: ‘to avoid teasing’, whilst looking at him enquiringly. He agrees with one firm nod that makes his hair flop back onto his forehead, but instead of pushing it back with his fingers, this time he tosses it back with an energetic movement of his head. He grins at me disarmingly and I hold his gaze, noticing that his brown eyes are watering, belying his exterior poise. He is still blushing. ‘There was a lot of teasing’, he says quietly and I can hear a hint of a French accent for the first time.‘You went to an English school then?’ I speculate. He nods again, vigorously and tells me that he is an only child and has always been very close to his mother. He went to the French school in London for his primary education but for his secondary education his father insisted that he should be sent away to a boarding school somewhere in the Home Counties. There he had to fit in with the English upper middle classes and he had decided it would be wise to change his name. He never felt at ease in his school and used to complain about this bitterly to his parents. His mother tried to convince his father for many years to let him be educated at home instead, but his father was adamant that Jerry should tough it out and stop being a mother’s boy.
Jerry thinks he has never forgiven his father for this callousness, but all the same he does take some pride in having managed to comply with his father’s expectations, sticking it out till his final exams. He pauses for a minute before admitting (blushing again) that he did have regular illnesses during this period of his life which afforded him time off at home being cosseted by his mother. He tells me, animatedly, that she is a fantastic and elegant woman with a great sense of beauty and fun. His genuine admiration for his mother is refreshing and touching but it also arouses my suspicion, because it is rare in one so young. He informs me with relish that he has always been the apple of her eye. She did not fail to convey to him that she favoured him over his father, who was often absent. He has no siblings, though his mother had a miscarriage soon after the family moved to England when he was about two years old.
After his secondary education he went to University in York, at which point his parents, at his mother’s insistence, bought a country house in Yorkshire, where he would usually spend his weekends with mother, while father was in the flat in London or the apartment in Paris. After his degree he lived in the London flat himself for a few years, sometimes sharing with his father. This was a relatively good time in his life, especially when dad was away in Paris or elsewhere. He had really enjoyed his professional training in photography, making portraiture his speciality. Since then he has been working as a freelance photographer and enjoys his job when it leaves him enough room for creativity. He has occasionally done photography jobs for his father’s company at official functions. He has mixed feelings about working with Dad, who is rather controlling.
Jerry has many friends, some very successful in their careers, some unemployed and he spans between these two worlds with ease and relish. He tells me with pride that he has had two girlfriends and that the second one, Jessica, is still part of his life now. From the way in which he describes Jessica in a rather detached and photo- graphic manner, I catch myself wondering whether there have been any boyfriends as well. He seems to expect my reaction and pre-empts a question by volunteering somewhat shyly that before his first girlfriend, he used to ‘occasionally indulge in sexual play’ with male friends. Here again he blushes and averts his eyes to avoid my gaze. I ask him if he finds men and women equally attractive and he confirms this, saying tentatively: ‘I suppose I could be described as bi-sexual’. I weigh these words for a moment, pondering his hesitancy before asking him kindly whether this is indeed how he would describe himself. Now he looks at me rather mischievously and he sounds relieved and rather reckless as he replies: ‘That all depends on who I am speaking to. My parents for instance do not know about any of this and Jessica certainly does not have a clue.’ His voice trails off. I declare sympathetically: ‘Ah, so you lead a double life!’ He nods regretfully and tells me of his inner conflicts in relation to his choice of partners and of his mother’s insistence that he should behave the same way as his cousins and all of her friends’ children, who by his age generally were married. He feels he has tried, for he has lived with Jessica occasionally over the past three years, but they decided to go their separate ways after his accident. I reckon there is a little bit more to it. There is a pause. We look at each other meaningfully. We both know we need to pursue this particular path for a bit. ‘Your accident then … ’ I state calmly and look at him to invite his account of what has brought him to my consulting room today.
Jerry reminds me that he is coming to see me for post-traumatic stress. His solicitor has referred him to me to help him overcome the after effects of a motorbike accident. About nine months ago Jerry was coming back from a holiday in France when he got caught sideways by a lorry on the slip road to a petrol station. He was dragged along for thirty yards and remained in a coma for several hours, had multiple fractures, including a skull fracture, and severe concussion. His physical recovery is nearly complete though he is still walking with some difficulty, something I only fully observe when he leaves my office at the end of the session.
Mentally and emotionally he feels a wreck. He says that he has terrible trouble sleeping since the accident. He feels anxious and depressed most of the time. He is incapable of doing work and cannot concentrate. He hates being with people. He has some flash- backs even though he has retrograde amnesia that stops him clearly recollecting the accident. Mostly he just doesn’t think the world is a safe place anymore. He figures he has had too much time to lie in bed and worry about things and a lot of his old problems have come back to haunt him. He sounds casually and painfully dismissive of his own plight and I stop him in his tracks by raising my eyebrows questioningly. He takes my cue immediately and informs me that these were his dad’s words. Mum and Dad have had arguments over his illness. Dad has written it off as ‘all in the mind’. Mum has been over-protective. He does not know what to think of it himself and he hates having to go through all the legal stuff and psychiatric examinations to get the settlement sorted. He doesn’t want to come across as weak and wishes he could just get back to normal. Yet, when he has tried to resume his old life, he has felt incapable of doing so. He has had to bail out of a photographic assignment in London, when he started to panic and feel queasy on the train down for instance. He does not recognize himself anymore. Somehow the accident has changed him and he thinks that nothing can ever be the same again. He thinks he could do with some help in getting his self-assurance back. We agree to work together for as long as it takes to build up his confidence and re-establish his independence again.
A formulating the predicament:
As Jerry engages with the therapy and reveals more about himself and his shocking lack of self-confidence his previous front of cool composure melts like snow before the sun. His posture shifts markedly as he slumps in the chair, pulling his legs underneath him and hugging himself. He says he has lost the
capacity to enjoy himself and feels unable to socialize. Other people just seem to him to talk nonsense, especially Jessica. He has told her he does not want to see her any- more. She doesn’t like coming up to Yorkshire anyway and she hates dealing with his illness, so the break-up has suited them both, he says cynically. He is also quite happy to avoid seeing his Dad now that he is not going to London anymore. Dad has been insensitive about the entire accident and just keeps talking about ‘getting back into the saddle’, he sneers. He makes a face and I invite him to put his grimace into words. I am aware that he is dismissing all the people in his life and I gently keep him exploring his disappointment rather than letting him pretend to not care. At first though he just needs encouragement to speak his frustration with the way he feels treated by others.
B rethinking the predicament:
He says his Dad is always in the saddle and has no other way to live. He has no time for anyone but himself or his business. Dad, he says with a pained expression, is a sad and twisted figure. I help Jerry look at this slightly differently by suggesting that he simply cannot take his Dad seriously anymore. He agrees wholeheartedly and adds that he does not understand why he used to feel so overawed by his father. He feels Dad understands nothing about other people at all. When I query what people he means, Jerry recognizes that he feels Dad understands him least of all. But he can also see how Dad is ruining his mother’s life by not loving her and by having regular affairs in London and abroad. He is strongly dismissive of his father’s conduct. I meekly point out that he speaks as if he feels superior to his Dad and this surprises him. Upon reflection he thinks he is probably beginning to feel strong enough to take his Dad on. He does not understand why his mother accepts his father’s odious behaviour. I point out he is now also challenging his mother’s behaviour and ask him if he himself has stood up to his dad about this. He can see now that he used to turn a blind eye to his father’s deceitful way of life and that he was too cowardly to confront him. He is tearful again but is annoyed with himself for crying. When I reassuringly suggest that his accident has made him more sensitive to all these experiences and that there may be some good in allowing the process to unfold, he gratefully accepts this idea. He does want to allow himself to experience and understand what was previously out of his ken. This is the first time he acknowledges that something positive may come out of what so far has seemed mostly negative. This will become a repeated theme: that the accident has revealed things that were previously hidden and that he wants to be in a new and better position to con- tend with all this. At the moment he sees human tragedy, danger and risk every- where and he feels overwhelmed by it. He is very concerned that he has lost his touch: he perceives and understands more than before but he lacks the strength to deal with it.
He sighs: ‘The world has become overpowering. It is all too much … ’ He looks down avoiding my gaze and his voice trails off as if he can’t cope anymore and is appealing for mercy. But rather than folding and going along with his weakness I now up the stakes: ‘Because you are both more vulnerable and more aware now. There is a great challenge to you here. You cannot hide any longer.’ He nods thought- fully, but he doesn’t look up. I wait before I continue speaking very slowly and whilst carefully observing his reaction: ‘and you also just acknowledged that this is freeing you from some old ideas and gives you a new perspective on other people, for instance on your father’. ‘Yes’, he says softly, hesitantly, as if he is wondering whether or not to pick up the gauntlet thrown at him: ‘but it makes me feel as if I am losing it. It feels as if I am reverting to what I used to be in secondary school: I feel different to other people.’ As I say nothing, he carries on: ‘I just feel so weak’. There is a brief silence between us. I speak tentatively when I reply eventually: ‘It is your feeling of weakness that is the real problem then?’ ‘Hmmm’, he mumbles. I want to establish whether we are on the same page and continue: ‘if you were able to feel stronger in relation to your new sensitivity and clear observations about others, then this new way of being might actually become a good thing, you think?’ He ponders and sways from side to side as he considers my point, literally wavering. Then a frank smile breaks through on his face as if a new idea has just sprung to mind. He hazards an interpretation: ‘Well, yes, it would actually. If I could hold on to my under- standing of what is happening around me and would not feel so overwhelmed by it all the whole time, then I could really quite enjoy it. It is quite creative in a way.’ He glances at me sideways as if to check my response. I smile encouragingly and he carries on: ‘You know, it’s a bit like artistic inspiration. I am in a new groove.’ I nod, smiling too. I say nothing. He beams and looks at me expectantly. I know he needs me to nail it down for him, summarize it somehow. I speak unhurriedly, finding the words little by little by thinking back to what he has discovered and articulated so far. He listens attentively, all ears, as if it is all coming together at last. What I say is nothing new, but somehow it needs saying. He needs to hear his predicament summarized and brought down to manageable size. He needs to be reminded of what he is up against, so that he can get ready to deal with it. ‘Something awful and important has happened in your life: a terrifying experience, an accident, out of the blue, shaking everything up, bringing you close to death, making everything seem different, giving you lots of new insights, a new perspective, different ideas about the world’. He approves. I look at him, wondering whether that is enough and whether he can take over and pursue the thought further, or whether he wants me to continue. He looks into my eyes now, openly, kind of confirming that he can stand it after all. He knows now that I don’t think him ridiculous or outrageous and that I value his struggle. He can begin to trust me. He can work with me and he does as he steps in to correct me: ‘But sometimes it doesn’t feel like that though’, he hastens to add. ‘Sometimes I just feel like I have been smashed to bits.’ ‘Yes’, I say mildly, ‘you still need to digest and process all this new experience so that you can integrate it and use it to good effect. You need to build new strength gradually, so as to be equal to your new sensitivity.’ He agrees again, enthusiastically. He feels buoyed up by my explanation of his weakness and the implied remedy for it. I see a glint of hope in his eyes as he smiles broadly.
c tackling the predicament: Then he tells me spontaneously how he has actively been avoiding his former group of friends and fears he is becoming a bit of a recluse. As is so often the case my encouragement makes him able to expose his lack of courage. I only need to prompt him a little bit for him to acknowledge that all this avoidance keeps him weak. We immediately agree that he has needed to avoid people for a while just to protect himself. It is alright. He really could not cope with all these people while he was so unwell. My approach is one of approving his past coping strategy whilst exposing its current redundancy. He speaks with gusto of how much he hates being in London nowadays. He cannot tolerate the noise and the traffic and he is scared of buses and trucks. This is a bit of a problem. He knows he will have to tackle it eventually. He feels much better in his mother’s country house, away from it all and cannot see himself going back to work. He has been living in Yorkshire with his mother ever since he came out of hospital and hopes to get a big insurance pay-out to allow him to continue living like this for a long time to come. Mother is worried about him, but enjoys fussing over him and she has told him and her friends that the accident has been a blessing in disguise because it has brought her son back to her. I point out that he looks both pleased and worried about this. This brings a wry smile to his lips. He is relieved to be able to speak the unspeakable love/ hate relationship he has with his Mum. We spend a long time debating this. He wants closeness with her and yet feels squashed by her. He agrees it will be best not to stay living at home for too long. This makes it so the more important for him to engage with the therapy.
He is beginning to formulate now what he wants from therapy: processing the distress and help him to get a new understanding of his past and present life, so that he can make something good out of the pieces he seems to have broken into when the lorry hit his head. He would like to sleep properly again and to feel less insecure when he goes out, but he does not want to go back to his old life. That is out of the question. He checks with me about the confidentiality of our conversations and then admits freely that he wants to get as much money out of the insurance company as possible and has no particular motivation to get back to normal. At the same time he does not want to end up as a disabled person, nor as someone who lacks in moral fibre or who is afraid all the time, as he is now. He is worried about his panic attacks and his lack of appetite for life. He cannot carry on this way and will make sure he gets himself sorted out as we work together over the next few months.
We agree then that he will use this time of weakness and incapacity to take stock of his life and make a new start. He can see how having hit rock bottom provides him with an opportunity to rebuild himself from scratch. He does not want to pre- tend and try to be the popular boy who pleases his mother and father anymore. He wants to rebuild his life on solid ground this time. He now feels therapy is a real chance of getting things right and he becomes a bit of a fan, reading therapy books and self-help books for fun.
a. recognizing the vicious circles:
By taking things so seriously Jerry quickly gets the hang of therapy and makes the most of it. He brings his concerns openly and does not hide his feelings and fears. Although he tries to play his PTSD symptoms down it becomes clear that the accident has nonetheless left a serious mark on him: the world seems unpredictable and sometimes he feels terrified in the face of things he used to take for granted as part of everyday life. Essentially he cannot face any form of transportation; he hates trains and cars and feels uncomfortable even on an ordinary bike. During the first months of therapy his mother drives him into Sheffield for the sessions and this becomes quite an issue since it brings out the conflicts in his relationship to her. His physical dependency on his Mum feeds the craving for her affection, but it also makes him increasingly impatient with her. I just encourage him to speak about it all and help him become aware of the old vicious circle. I also draw his attention to his frustration and his desire to escape from it.
b. facing limitations:
I keep telling him to simply observe his relationship to his mum rather than to try to change it. This frees him to realize he wants to change it for his own sake. He starts noticing that she seems to encourage his reliance on her. Then, with very little prompting, he begins to think about her dependency on him. It strikes him for the first time that she has always needed him as much as he needed her. It occurs to him that his mother has claimed him as the special person who can shield her from the world in the same way in which he needs her to shield him from the world just now. The difference is that he wants to get independent of her, whilst she seems to want him to remain dependent. But then he is not certain about this either. There is much evidence to the contrary too and sometimes he feels confused about it. In many ways it is him who is clinging to her. He wonders: ‘Is it wrong for my mother and I to feel comfort in each other’s company?’ and he returns to this question regularly. It is the central dilemma of his life. Sometimes it is phrased as: ‘should I be independent and suffer alone or should I rely on another and learn to be close?’ At other times it is formulated as: ‘is it possible to tolerate the difficulties of a hazardous world without hiding in a safe place?’ By allowing these questions to emerge out of his struggles with the concrete problems of his daily existence he begins to reflect on his life in a way he has not done before. He comes to accept that his mother’s love has always been an essential part of his self-confidence and that there is nothing wrong with reclaiming it at this point in his life to help him to find his feet again. Once he feels entitled to making the most of their closeness and stops fighting it, he can begin to see the limits of their mutual dependency as well. It becomes obvious to him that it can stop them both from exploring further afield and can hinder as much as help his recovery. He is starting to see how it is stopping his mother from moving on in her own life as well. She spends time with him, protecting him from his panic attacks instead of finishing her interior decorating course. He notices how she reproaches his father for not spending more time with them in Yorkshire to be with their injured son, rather than confronting the reality of the long standing estrangement in the marriage. Quite quickly simply by being able to talk about his observations and understand what is going on, he becomes able to confront her on her hypocrisy rather than siding with her against Dad as he used to in the past. He can even tell her that he knows how she has always encouraged Dad to live his own life and has pushed him away because she would rather just be with her son anyway. He is surprised to find that his mother is grateful to him for saying these things to her rather than feeling hurt. It proves to him that he is now getting stronger than he has ever been before and he relishes this idea.
c.finding new meaning:
We generally talk very little of his post-traumatic symptoms, though we spend a little time thinking about suitable strategies in relation to insomnia and fear of public transport. By sticking to the very basic daily struggles he brings to therapy and helping him to clarify and understand his own experience and observations, he begins to recognise his own capacity for solving each of these problems. He comes for some twenty sessions before he realizes that he is dealing with his daily life in a new way. He is getting stronger. He isn’t fighting his symptoms and fears anymore but looks forward to facing them because in doing so he can take up the challenge of understanding the underlying dynamics. He recognizes that the trauma of the accident has opened his eyes to the complexities and dangers of living in a way he had never thought possible and he admits one day that he is beginning to enjoy the work of relearning to exist and that he now looks forward to therapy sessions.
His general therapeutic reading is moving towards a focus on existential literature and he becomes an expert at arguing with me about philosophical interpretations of his experience. He enjoys sitting up at night reading books and he stops complaining of insomnia all together. I challenge him to apply his newly found philosophical expertise to the concrete problems that persist in his physical existence and he starts experimenting with ways of overcoming his fear of transportation at this stage. He begins a programme of country walking, working up from two miles a day to seven or eight miles a day. He is aware that walking is safer for him than relying on mechanical means of transport, even though he finds it quite challenging to walk on the side of A-roads where cars and trucks rush past him. As he gets used to the traffic on these roads, he feels his confidence returning and he starts riding his old push- bike along small country lanes. He finds the freedom of this experience so exhilarating that he acquires a new cross-country bike and a lot of sophisticated biking equipment and learns new skills in negotiating the hills of the Yorkshire countryside. He has no interest in going back on a motorbike, but without even mentioning it to me, he resumes driving a car to come into town to attend sessions or to pick up new materials for his bike.
a. facing anxiety and guilt:
Jerry’s fears of traffic are slowly abating as he finds a way to negotiate the world of transportation by relying on his own wits. He is somewhat concerned at his progress, for we are now some 30 weeks into the ther- apy and his insurance claim for the posttraumatic stress has still not been settled. He worries that his forthcoming psychiatric report will not corroborate his original PTSD diagnosis, since he is now ‘nearly cured’, and that his insurance claim will be in jeopardy. This is a strange, but not unusual, predicament and we talk about it quite a bit. He agrees that it is not worth pretending to be ill for the sake of a pay- off if the price of this is to stop him getting better. Honesty and facing up to his experience have been the core of his improvement. He cannot undo this now. Would it be so bad if he did not have a huge pay out? Might it even be better to challenge himself and pick up his life by himself rather than being cushioned by the insurance company? We think about how he might cope if he were destitute and alone. He gets great comfort from the idea that he would actually relish the challenge.
b. getting real:
When the psychiatric assessment does come, he finds, to his relief that the assessment is mainly related to his professional life. The fact that he has not resumed his job and is not likely to fully do so for another few months, makes all the difference to the settlement. We both breathe a sigh of relief when this is sorted, for now there is nothing more to stop his improvement. I had grave doubts about his willingness to get back to work until his compensation claim had been put behind him. Now we can finally discuss his ambivalent attitude towards his job. Eventually he comes to the conclusion that he misses his photography but not the work in London.
The moment the case is settled he starts to take his camera out on his rides into the hills and gets engrossed in landscape photography, very quickly building up a portfolio of work which leads to some professional contracts. When he finally receives the money from the insurance company for loss of income and in compensation for the physical and emotional trauma he has suffered, he decides to stay in the area rather than moving back to London and he buys a flat in an up and coming area of town, from which he decides to set up a new photography business. His Mum and Dad are both surprised at his regeneration and each in their own way respond with some ambivalence. This leads to some arguments and rows. Jerry needs quite a bit of help in thinking his way through these at times, but it is all his doing that he doesn’t give up and keeps sorting things out with them. At first it is his father who begins to treat him in a more mature and respectful way. At this point Jerry decides to revert back to his given name, Jerome and feels he is well on the way towards a full recovery, capable of standing up for himself.
After about a year and a half of weekly sessions Jerôme/Jerry starts seeing me fort- nightly. We talk mostly about his relationships now, rather than about physical or psychological problems. His relationship to his mother is still problematic and he is still in two minds about how much to condone her desire to be close. This same question arises about his relationship to me. As a mother substitute I have become quite neces- sary to him as well. He agrees with me that finding a new distance from me will help him in doing the same with his mother. A few months later he switches to coming to see me once a month and continues to see me on this basis for another ten sessions.
I am not surprised when some time during this period he tells me that he has found a new partner, Josh, also a photographer, eight years his senior. Very quickly they build a mutual and committed relationship and when Jerome comes to see me for the final session, he and Josh have started not only to work but also live together. He brings his partner along to introduce us to each other. Jerome appears full of confidence and is brimming over with plans and projects in his new life. The two of them seem extremely happy together: as far as I can tell they are relaxed and affectionate with each other. He introduces me as: ‘the lady who changed my life’ and when I correct him with: ‘you mean, the lady who helped you to see how you could change your life’, I laugh at my own impudence disguised as false modesty. For really, it was neither me nor him who did the work, for all we did was to let life guide him through the complexity of his accident, so that he could thrive on rather than suffer from the far reaching effects it had on his life.
Binswanger, L. (1963) Being-in-the-World, trans. J. Needleman. New York: Basic Books.
Boss, M. (1957a) Psychoanalysis and Daseinsanalysis, trans. L.B. Lefebre. New York: Basic Books.
Boss, M. (1957b) The Analysis of Dreams. London: Rider. Boss, M. (1979) Existential Foundations of Medicine and Psychology. New York: Jason Aronson.
Bugental, J.F.T. (1981) The Search for Authenticity: An Existential-Analytic Approach to Psychotherapy. New York: Irvington.
Cohn, H.W. (1994) ‘What is existential psychotherapy?’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 165(8): 669–701.
Cohn, H.W. (1997) Existential Thought and Therapeutic Practice. London: Sage.
Cohn, H.W. (2002) Heidegger and the Roots of Existential Therapy. London: Continuum.
Cooper, D. (1967) Psychiatry and Anti-psychiatry. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Cooper, R. (ed.) (1989) Thresholds between Philosophy and Psycho-analysis. London: Free Association Books.
Cooper, M, (2003) Existential Therapies, London: Sage. De Koning, A.J.J. and Jenner, F.A. (1982) Phenomenology and Psychiatry. New York: Academic Press.
Deurzen-Smith, E. van (1984) ‘Existential therapy’, in W. Dryden (ed.), Individual Therapy in Britain. London: Harper & Row.
Deurzen-Smith, E. van (1997) Everyday Mysteries: Existential Dimensions of Psychotherapy. London: Routledge. Second edition, 2010.
Deurzen, E. van (1998) Paradox and Passion in Psychotherapy. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
Deurzen, E. van (2002) Existential Counselling and Psychotherapy in Practice, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
Deurzen, E. van and Arnold-Baker, C. (2005) Existential Perspectives on Human Issues: a Handbook for Practice. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Deurzen, E. van and Kenward, R. (2005) Dictionary of Existential Psychotherapy and Counselling, London: Sage.
Du Plock, S. (1997) Case Studies in Existential Psychotherapy. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
Eleftheriadou, Z. (1994) Transcultural Counselling. London: Central Book Publishing.
Frankl, V.E. (1964) Man’s Search for Meaning. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Frankl, V.E. (1967) Psychotherapy and Existentialism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Heaton, L.M. (1988) The Provocation of Levinas. London: Routledge.
Heaton, L.M. (1994) Wittgenstein for Beginners. Cambridge: Icon.
Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E.S. Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1968) What is Called Thinking? New York: Harper & Row. Husserl, E. (1960) Cartesian Meditations. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1962) Ideas. New York: Collier.
Jaspers, K. (1951) The Way to Wisdom, trans. R. Manhneim. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Jaspers, K. (1963) General Psychopathology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kearney, R. (1986) Modern Movements in European Philosophy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1941) Concluding Unscientific Postscript, trans. D.F. Swenson and W. Lowrie. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1944) The Concept of Dread, trans. W. Lowrie. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Laing, R.D. (1960) The Divided Self. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Laing, R.D. (1961) Self and Others. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Laing, R.D. and Cooper, D. (1964) Reason and Violence. London: Tavistock.
Lemma-Wright, A. (1994) Starving to Live. The Paradox of Anorexia Nervosa. London: Central Book Publishing.
Lomas, P. (1981) The Case for a Personal Psychotherapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mace, C. (ed.) (1999) Heart and Soul: The Therapeutic Face of Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Macquarrie, J. (1972) Existentialism: an Introduction, Guide and Assessment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
May, R. (1969) Love and Will. New York: Norton. May, R. (1983) The Discovery of Being. New York: Norton.
May, R. and Yalom, L. (1985) ‘Existential psychotherapy’, in R.S. Corsini (ed.), Current Psychotherapies.Itasca, IL: Peacock.
May, R., Angel, E. and Ellenberger, H.F. (1958) Existence. New York: Basic Books.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Minkowski, E. (1970) Lived Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Moran, D. (2000) Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.
Nietzsche, F. (1961) Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. R.J. Hollingdale. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Nietzsche, F. (1974) The Gay Science, trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Random House.
Nietzsche, F. (1986) Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, trans. R.J. Hollingdale. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Sartre, J.P. (1956) Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology, trans. H. Barnes. New York: New York Philosophical Library.
Sartre, J.P. (1962) Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions. London: Methuen.
Smail, D.J. (1978) Psychotherapy, a Personal Approach. London: Dent. Smail, D.J. (1987) Taking Care. London: Dent.
Smail, D.J. (1993) The Origins of Unhappiness: A New Understanding of Personal Distress. London:HarperCollins.
Spiegelberg, H. (1972) Phenomenology in Psychology and Psychiatry. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Spinelli, E. (1997) Tales of Unknowing. London: Duckworth.
Spinelli, E. (2005) The Interpreted World: An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology, 2nd edn, London: Sage.
Strasser, F. and Strasser, A. (1997) Existential Time Limited Therapy. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
Tantam, D. (2002) Psychotherapy and Counselling in Practice: a Narrative Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Tillich, P. (1952) The Courage to Be. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Valle, R.S. and King, M. (1978) Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Warnock, M. (1970) Existentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yalom, I. (1980) Existential Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
Suggested further reading:
Cohn, H. W, (2002) Heidegger and the Roots of Existential Therapy London: Continuum.
Cooper M, (2003) Existential Therapies, London: Sage.
Deurzen, E. van (1998) Paradox and Passion in Psychotherapy. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
Deurzen, E. van (2002) Existential Counselling and Psychotherapy in Practice, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
Macquarrie, J. (1972) Existentialism: an Introduction, Guide and Assessment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Warnock, M. (1970) Existentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yalom, I. (1980) Existential Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
Summary of Existential Therapeutic Practice.
- Existential psychotherapy is based on philosophical and ontological, rather than psychological or medical parameters.
- The objective is to help client become aware of who they are and what they want to be, in the context of given possibilities and limitations.
- The process begins by enabling people to become more truthful with themselves.
- The method encourages people to learn to uncover what is the case instead of covering up.
- It helps people discover what the tensions are between the universal and particular aspects of a person’s existence, between the finite and the infinite aspects of their lives.
- It aims to achieve greater awareness of where in life one is at and get a new sense of direction.
- This is done by describing what is happening carefully and attentively. This is about teaching people to observe, explore, search, question, create.
- The objective is to better understand the challenges of human living and acquire a map of the human condition as well as clarity on where one is in the overall landscape of one’s personal life.
- This also requires a quest to get to know one’s position in the world, the objective of the journey and of our own talents in making something special of the travelling.
- Existential therapy uses systematic phenomenological description of the person’s situation and experience of the situation. Phenomenology throws light by elucidating what is observed from different angles and perspectives.
- Existential therapy aims to bring out the contradictions and paradoxes: this allows us to find balance and flexibility.
- It also recognizes the person’s assumptions and prejudices, getting a sense of a person’s worldview. This is done systematically on four dimensions: Physical, social, personal and spiritual.
- Existential therapy sees the person as the centre of a network of relationships rather than as a substantial self.
- It therefore helps a person to become aware of their connectivity and relational nature, in order to help them gain authority and authorship over the way in which they seek to engage with these relationships.
- Becoming more tuned in to sensations, emotions, thoughts and intuitions allows a person to become more centred as the source of experience.
- This also allows us to bring a person back to hearing the call of conscience: experiencing anxiety and heeding the sense of unease with self and world.
- In this process time is an important parameter as well as space. We learn to recollect the past, explore the present and project into the future, rather than be all in the past or trying to focus exclusively on the present.
- In this way people are enabled to get a sense of what it is that really matters to them, enough to live and die for.
- An exploration of a person’s original project, their intentionality, values and beliefs will lead to them being able to create a more meaningful life.
- The whole of existential therapy is based on the Socratic idea that the un-reflected life is not worth living.
- Existential therapy leads to understanding the difference between living by default or by deliberation: setting priorities and investigating consequences of actions and attitudes.
- While the person becomes Res-ponse-able and of moments of vision, ultimately they grasp the idea of the possibility of their own liberation.
I’m just completing my Level 4 Diploma in Counselling. I’d like to focus more on an Existential approach as I go into practice. Which of Emmy’s books would you recommend as an introduction to the subject?
The easiest book to start with is: Deurzen and Adams, Skills in Existential Therapy (Sage, 2011)
After that the classic: Deurzen, Existential Counselling and Psychotherapy in Practice (Sage, 2002)
Then Deurzen, Everyday Mysteries, (Routldege, 2010) which is the handbook of existential therapy.
ps and don’t forget to rate the books on amazon, that really helps me!
Thanks very much, that’s really helpful.
It might help you to take a look at the article on Existential Therapy from my chapter in the Dryden handbook. I posted it up and you can find it by clicking on the tab ‘existential therapy’ under posts…
I am a undergraduate psychology student and came across Existentialism through a Philosophy class I am currently taking. I came across your work through a search in Amazon and am currently reading Everyday Mysteries on my Kindle. I love the book and was wondering if there are any good Existential Psychotherapy books aimed at beginners or laypersons you would recommend. I am grateful for coming across this body of work because it is helping me during a time of crisis. Thank you.
Have you thought of writing a book on Existentialism for the layperson?
Have a look at Mick Cooper’s Existential Therapies. Or at my recent co-authored book ‘Skills in Existential Counselling and Psychotherapy’.
And yes, I will be doing a lay person’s book at some point. The issue is to find the right publisher. It is a different market entirely.
As a student of counselling I would be interested to hear your views on using existential counselling on a client who was suffering from “empty nest” syndrome
Since empty nest syndrome is the epitome of existential Angst and identity crisis, the existential approach is completely relevant!
I am keen to make the leap into existential therapies but unsure where to start given my qualifications are in the Arts/Humanities although more recently a CBT/dip and a number of short courses on adolescent behaviour etc.( I will get the books recommended above by you) . My experience is working with Adolescents in school & college setting as a mentor; many of those suffering from mental health problems, incl. OCD’s,ADHD autism, bi-polar etc. I work in an existential way based solely on my personal understanding of the philosophical works I have read(wading through Socrates and Stoicism); giving the young person the freedom to explore their anxieties in a safe environment without prejudice and in confidence. Further help lead them to their own conclusions based on their needs and expectations. It is because of this I recognise the need to develop my understanding of self and others in a wider context and to continue studying in this field.
Your background is absolutely fine for training as an existential therapist, especially as you mention something about enabling people the freedom to explore. Have a look at the New School website: either you may need to start with a short course on existential therapy, or with a foundation course. Or, if you already did a basic counselling training you may be able to apply directly to the DProf in Existential Psychotherapy, which leads to a doctorate with Middlesex University and accreditation with the United Kingdom Council of Psychotherapy.
The address is: http://www.nspc.org.uk
I have no experience / qualifications in psychotherapy at present but am interested in pursuing a career in existential therapy. I have an Undegraduate degree in Philosophy and existentialism is very much my area of interest, and I’m planning to undertake a Masters Degree next year, but am currently unsure as to which course would be most practical in the long term: a Philosophy course focusing on Existentialism, or something psychology-related. I am also considering the idea of studying in Japan which is where I am now.
Any suggestions would be very much appreciated!
We are launching a new online MSc in Psychotherapy Studies from January, which you could do from Japan.
We also offer our Professional Doctorate in Existential Psychotherapy and Counselling on an intensive basis for those who want to come over to London on a regular basis.
Your view on life and existential therapy is absolutely great. What a wisdom you have acquired in the course of your life. I am working presently on a book with an existential-psychological view myself. When the Dutch version is ready I hope I may approach you for having a glance and advising me on an English version.
I will be happy to take a look at an electronic version of your Dutch book. Good luck with that.
I am sorry but my previous post was unedited – a mistake which I hope you will forgive and look at this version instead:
Although the shift from epistemology to ontology posited by existential thinkers as the starting place for philosophical analysis, together with their questioning of traditional dualisms have certainly infused and influenced much contemporary philosophical thinking, in purely academic terms existentialism has been effectively dead in the water for decades; so much so that is usually taught only as background and history in most philosophy departments. Why does your work focus so much on this outmoded narrative and why do you seem to take no wreck of more challenging and contemporary philosophical enquiries or encourage others to do so? I am not a therapist but have had occasion to meet and discuss existential analysis and psychotherapy with others who have significant experience of it, including a number of students. None of them seem to have a well-grounded or broad-based understanding of philosophy in general. Not only that but they also have an extremely skewed idea of existential philosophy and are often unable to connect it to other strands of intellectual history. Surely a philosophical based praxis should demand a greater degree of engagement with its foundational disciplines than you seem to encourage? To practise as an existential therapist would one not need a deep and scholarly understanding of philosophy in general – up to and including the British school of analytic and linguistic philosophers and the correctives they offer? Both Russell and Ayer, for example, delivered excoriatingly perceptive and scholarly critiques of Heidegger’s obscurantist and in some cases literally meaningless and contradictory use of language. The prevailing contemporary critique of existential writers is that most of them were not only insensitive to the syntactic and semantic properties of the language they employed but frequently wrote what can only be described as linguistic and logical nonsense. Heidegger, for example, hypostatizes Being and Nothing as substantial entities, His revisioning of the subject/object distinction which forms a central pillar of existential psychotherapy is logically self-contradictory because it is impossible to argue against the necessity of the subject/object paradigm without employing it in the very contention which attempts to refute it. None of this balance is apparent either in your work or your teaching and I wonder how much more useful and scholarly both would be if you encouraged a more critical approach? Your adherence to the existential method sometimes appears, frankly, cultish.
You obviously come to philosophy from a very different angle than I do. Most of my philosophy training took place in France and I can assure you that your picture of what has happened to the history of philosophy over the past decades is a very limited and anglo-saxon one.
The other thing you forget is that the people who train with me in existential psychotherapy are training as psychotherapists and counselling psychologists rather than as philosophers and that it would be unrealistic to expect them to have the kind of broad philosophical training you are suggesting.
As it happens though, we are currently looking into launching a post-graduate course in philosophical counselling, which would have the broader philosophical foundation that you are speaking of and which might require a first degree in philosophy as entry point.
But such a programme also raises its own problems. Philosophers sometimes end up practising as counsellors without an understanding of the emotional and personal sensitivity required in practising psychotherapy. These take a long time to acquire as does the technical and intellectual psychological knowledge that is also fundamental for this type of work. The ideal programme then, where people would acquire psychological, philosophical and therapeutic training to the level one would like to see them have, would take far too long. I find it easy to concur with you that there is a danger that psychotherapists coming to philosophy without a broader philosophical training risk to be simplistic in their philosophical thinking, but I don’t accept your sweeping rejection of all existential authors, nor do I think your remarks about logical nonsense are very enlightening.
At the New School, we encourage a critical approach, but one based in applying phenomenological research methods rather than the teaching of logic. Students learn to connect with people rather than to criticise their logic. Therapy is about understanding and clarifying, not about argumentation. My response to anyone so keen to condemn is to demonstrate through their own work how things can be done better. There is always room for improvement, but my experience tells me improvement rarely happens from criticising others.
Bravo to Emmy’s dictum “Therapy is about understanding and clarifying, not about argumentation.” I may guess and sympathize with where you’re coming from, Carey, but I can assure you that the more you are focused on (or obsessed with) analyses, logics, linguistics, and other scholarship as you seem to suggest, (which are all great tools to refine one’s criticisms and “win” arguments), the further you will get from understanding and clarifying the inner world of the person sitting in front of you.
Hi Emmy. Thanks for a considered response. Actually you are quite wrong in your assumption about my background. I am no great fan of the analytic or linguistic philosophers for reasons that are probably outside the context of this forum. In fact my philosophical and theoretical background is no less “continental” in flavour or learning than your own and actually conceivably rather wider since little of your work seems to take into account movements in continental philosophy which have taken place since the birth – and conceivably (with the advent of critical realism) – the death of postmodernism. So I’ll agree to overlook your rather patronising comment on the understanding that perhaps I did not make myself fully clear. Let me also clearly state that I do not dismiss “existential” writers or thinkers in the “sweeping” manner you suggest. That, of course, does not mean I have to accept their work, or, for that matter, that contained within any other philosophical edifice, uncritically. Existentialism, together with structuralism and post-structuralism, was a valuable foil to the sophistry of Oxford, Cambridge, Yale and Harvard. having said that, although I am frustrated by twentieth century Anglophone philosophy in many ways, I do think that some of their ideas about the use of language provide a powerful critical lens through which to view many of the continentals. On that note it is important to remember also that these criticisms are far from purely “Anglo-Saxon” in origin. You may be familiar with the work of Popper, Marcuse and Adorno – none of whom were remotely Anglo-Saxon in their thinking. Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont provide another good example of a non-Anglophone critique. Their Impostures Intellectuelles delivers a damning critique of, among others, Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva, Paul Virilio, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, Luce Irigaray, Bruno Latour, and Jean Baudrillard. (Sokal is best known for submitting a deliberately absurd article to Social Text, a respected critical theory journal, who published it in spite of its being completely meaningless. Sokal and Bricmont argue very much along the lines of Ayer et al that much of continental philosophy is grounded in the unhelpful and unscholarly use of scientific or pseudoscientific terminology, the importation of concepts from the natural sciences or classical languages without any real understanding, justification, or rationale. They also go on to suggest that many continental thinkers (and I would include both Heidegger and Sartre among them) display superficial erudition by coining and deploying ill-conceived neologisms and irrelevant technical terms. They also accuse the writers who form the subject of their critique of displaying an unjustified degree of self-assurance on topics which are far beyond their competence. This latter criticism has been levelled time and time again at Heidegger who clumsily plagiarised and misrepresented many Greek concepts which were far beyond his level of understanding and erudition in that language. It’s true that I have great problems with Heidegger, largely because so much of his writing is confused and contradictory and tautological. Subsequent thinkers have gone a long way to unravel many of these contradictions but in so doing they have effectively splintered interpretations to the point where no truly coherent meaning has emerged. As for Sartre, his basic problem of reconciling determinist Marxism with its insistence on the “self” as an economically constructed subject and notions of individual freedom have never been satisfactorily reconciled either by him or his followers. I appreciate your point that therapists do not have to be philosophers (or vice versa) but am confused by your postulating that “improvement rarely happens from criticising others”. In the philosophical world – i.e. the world which underpins you theorising and therapeutic model – the ONLY way in which improvement or progress happens is by taking a critical view of others and their work. You say that “Therapy is about understanding and clarifying, not about argumentation” as if disagreement and contention where to be frowned upon and avoided. There seems to be a concealed value judgement here which implies that anyone who challenges your views is somehow guilty of being “condemning” and thereby culpable and that intellectual debate should be stifled in the interests of some woolly humanist notion which is in direct contradiction to much existential thought (didn’t Heidegger himself split with Sartre because the latter sought to insert Englightenment Humanism into a phenomenological perspective which denied the primacy of the concrete self and was essentially anti-humanit if not anti-human?). As a philosopher my project is not to sanctify or enshrine any one abstraction as inviolable truth but to remain open to all possibilities and also to an intellectual critique of my own views. This is what I meant by “cultish”. You seem unwilling to engage in a debate about the seeming contradictions in your work and I get the feeling that you are somehow muddling the idea of debate with notiond of attack or conflict. I am particularly puzzled by your repated reference to logic. Had I levelled a critique of the existentialists purely from a perspective based on axiomatic consistency then that would make sense. But I didn’t. So it doesn’t. I have only met a handful of existential therapists but I have read the work of many of them and for me the basic problem remains unresolved. They seem to be taught to believe that they are philosophers when they are actually anything but, and I have to say that your apparent discomfort with “argumentation” seems to militate against a rounded view of the material in hand. Perhaps this is best summed up by a conversation I had with a student at a London University recently (not your own) who was in the final stages of a diploma in integrative counselling which included a strong emphasis on the existential model. We were talking about “authenticity” and when I referred to Adorno’s critique of Heideggerian notions of authenticity in his book “The Jargon of Authenticity”. She first asked who Adorno was, then asked if he was “existential” and when told that he was probably not concluded the conversation by saying that “in that case he doesn’t know what he’s talking about so it doesn’t matter”. Duh!
Thanks for your vigorous comments, which I find stimulating in their knowledgeable and passionate challenge though, once again, rather more adversarial than I am comfortable with and because of that overall more upsetting than illuminating.
The attacking manner of your engagement with my work makes it a chore rather than a pleasure to respond with calm consideration. This is not, as you are supposing, because anyone who challenges my views is to be dismissed as condemnatory, but because anyone who is condemnatory rather than constructive is in my experience not able and willing to debate an issue with fairness or with a serious commitment to mutuality and joint learning.
This is, I believe the problem with much of philosophy, which has a tradition of dismissive argumentation rather than cooperation. In the sciences we tend to base ourselves on facts instead and this can often lead to cooperation in thinking, which in my view is a far more conducive model for progress. There is a lot to learn from the practice of psychology and psychotherapy in terms of how to conduct human relations in a way that is collaborative rather than competitive. I relish engaging in philosophical conversations that are based in dialogue. But I object to being taken to task in an attacking manner.
If you want to engage in a dialogue about my work in the spirit of mutual learning, I shall, as always, welcome this, as I am keen to remain open and flexible. I have however no patience with people who pick fights with me in order to dismiss me and accuse me of all sorts of failings. I consider that a form of cyber bullying. I would invite you to join the LInked In Existential Therapy group, which is a more appropriate forum for an interchange than my personal website.
Just a final word about your criticism of existential therapists.
Of course it is easy to show that existential therapists do not have the kind of wide range of reading that you yourself have acquired. I have to admit I have not had the time to keep up with authors such as Sokal and Bricmont, myself, but will now certainly do so. Thank you for that tip. But certainly Adorno is on our reading list and a critique of the philosophers we teach is very much part of the NSPC curriculum. But of course I cannot vouch for the rather more superficial way in which others are now teaching existential therapy on counselling courses across the country.
Your own knowledge of the field is admirable and I would love you to come and teach a one day course for NSPC at some point. But only if you can, for your part, show some respect for what therapists may have to teach you in turn, especially about how to engage with someone else’s perspective, rather than try to prove it wrong, and then accuse them of patronisation or stifling the debate or of carrying ‘humanist’ notions. Such statements, in my experience usually lead to less human understanding and a desire to dismiss the other.
Let me explain where I am coming from in my response. It has taken me forty years of extremely hard work to get psychologists and psychotherapists to the point where existential methods are now widely accepted. This has meant dealing with broad disagreements, constant conflicts and sometimes vicious attacks of all sorts with patience and consideration and continuing to build a strong base from which to teach and train people.
Of course it is easy to show that people who have been trained in this approach, fail to bring the wide philosophical background and training that you display yourself. If you think you can improve on what has been achieved, that is great, but you will then still have to make that contribution, in a positive manner, rather than by dismissing other people’s work. I have long thought that a philosophy degree is the best background for therapy training, but sometimes it creates the wrong attitude in a person and it can take quite some time before they understand a more therapeutic way of engagement, in the tradition of people like Jaspers, Tillich, Marcel, Buber and Scheler. That is my personal preference. Not because I want to patronise, but because I do not want to be patronised, especially not by those who haven’t yet proven their worth.
Emmy, I am super impressed and enlightened by your responses. I live in New York City and practice as a Clinical Social Worker. I have been following your work for quite some time and the work has been of great use in helping to assist individuals in all walks of life. In order to harm someone they have to cease to be someone. We hurt someone because we are able to take someone that happens to be human and invent something that says they are not human. This person is ———————-. Therefore, they are not good. It is much easier to remove someone’s humanity then to see that humanity and embrace it. When we are kind to others we make ourselves better and we make the world better. It seems that the search for “truth finding” has lost its function. It’s rather become a function of self with the immediate task of making the other instantly invisible. Thank you for your help and your work.
Tahl Leibovitz, LCSW
I agree Tahi.
Emmy. I cannot find anything in my posts which dismisses, traduces or condemns your work or that of any of the philosophers you admire. I am also rather surprised that you find what I intended as a challenging and open debate asking genuine questions in a spirit of critical consideration to be “upsetting”. Perhaps this hinges upon a key differentiator which you yourself highlight in your very cogent and heartfelt response. What I find most exciting and interesting about philosophy – its tradition of argumentation, disputation refutation and dissent – seems to be precisely what you yourself find problematic about it. That concerns me, not just because I feel that some of my important questions have been somewhat glossed over (I am certain, for example, that your take on Heideggerian phenomenology would have had much to offer me) but also in the sense that debate centred upon discerning judgement of ideas and theories has been the foundation of philosophical enquiry since time immemorial and if philosophers lose sight of that imperative in the light of personal feelings then they risk missing the point of philosophy altogether. My questions and critique are levelled at ideas and concepts not at individuals. I do not know you and have never met you and even had I done so I would be extremely careful not to allow whatever personal feelings arose to colour any academic dialogue I might have with you. By way of example, I am fortunate enough to number among my close friends several barristers who have on occasion appeared against each other in court and engaged in the most excoriating attacks upon each other’s legal interpretations and cases with the intention of arriving at some kind of synthetic agreement on what is actually “true”. I have also sat down to dinner with these people and found them able to hold the most amicable and genuinely friendly dialogue with each other utterly unaffected by what might have been said in a courtroom weeks or months before. Please do not make the fatal mistake of confusing my robust questioning of your philosophical standpoint with a personal attack. That having been said, I do understand that it is sometimes hard to separate one’s passion for an idea with one’s own sense of self-worth and value particularly when one is working in a field such as yours where what you do and who you are are sometimes necessarily conflated. As a dry old academic that is not a dichotomy which troubles me, although strangely enough as a painter I am often deeply hurt if my work is given a poor critical reception or if I feel it has been misunderstood. Having said all that Emmy, if the only way you feel able to respond to my questions concerning your work and your theorising is to confuse my serious interest and desire to engage in the kind of informed and energetic debate to which career academics such as myself are accustomed with some kind of personal animus then I am sorry I troubled you. I am also frankly rather offended by your, to my mind, unwarranted and serious accusation of “cyber-bullying”. It is all too easy to stifle online debate with accusations of that nature and I fear this is precisely what will happen here, because I feel that you are either being disingenuous in your reluctance to engage or that you are too sensitive a flower for me to correspond with further. Either way I will try to find some other forum for my questioning. I wish you all the best for the future – particularly with the new course which sounds very interesting. Thank you for your contributions so far and goodbye for now.
Sorry Emmy – you don’t need to publish this as it is a personal message. Thank you for your invitation to join your LInked In group. Unfortunately I really limit my online presence on social and professional networking sites these days as both myself and a number of colleagues and personal friends have experienced some serious privacy issues with Twitter, LInked In and Facebook.
Carey. We clearly have very different ideas about the ground rules of human relations. We also have different views of what makes philosophy great. I don’t think it is the tradition of argumentation, disputation, refutation and dissent that is its strength, especially not when this leads to ad hominem attacks such as ‘you must be either disingenuous or too sensitive a flower for me to correspond with you’. I don’t think any existential therapist with any sort of decent training would even dream of speaking to someone in such a manner. Especially not after having gone to their website to initiate a challenge which had already been responded to rather generously.
I think what is great about philosophy is its genuine search for truth, when this is undertaken, not in an adversarial manner, but through a collaborative enquiry into the way in which different points of view may illuminate the same issue from different perspectives. My experience of being an expert witness in court has shown me that barristers are generally far more into game playing than truth finding and I am glad you judge me not to be up to their standard of sophistry.
I will not respond any further on this page. If you did want to engage in a constructive debate, there are plenty of fora in which I participate and I am sure our paths will cross again.
I do understand the points you raise and appreciate and respect your views. But please remember that I am not a therapist, existential or otherwise so forgive me for not responding as one.
Thank you again.
Pingback: Experts on the Meaning of Life Gather in Toronto | The Psychology of Wellbeing
I look forward to being in Toronto in July.
Thanks for finally talking about > Existential Therapy | Emmy van Deurzen < Loved it!
Dr. Van Deurzen allow me to introduce myself.
My name is Maria Ximena Torres, I am a Colombian psychology student, and right now i’m working on my thesis about group intervention from Logotherapy, also I have a great interest in learning in depth about Existential Psychotherapy, which I know you are an expert on. I’ve tried to reach your literature, however, it’s been quite a challenge to find your books and papers from my country, which is why, I would like to know if there’s a way you could allow me access to your latest work, and also if there are any others you would recommend that would help me get a deeper knowledge in Existential Psychotherapy and also enriches or complements my understanding about the applications of existential philosophy to psychotherapy.
With all my interest, hope to hear from you soon,
Psychologist in formation
You can find many of my papers and other writings on http://www.researchgate.net
Dr. van Deurzen,
My fellow student (Anne) and I are giving a presentation on Existentialism this day week and we were wondering if you could tell us briefly how relevant you feel existentialism is now in the modern world? And what you feel the future has in store for existential psychotherapy?
We would be must grateful for your contribution i.e. a quote.
Such requests or questions that are relevant to others can be asked in my Facebook group on Existential Therapy. Glad to speak to you there, publicly, but can’t answer all the many requests I get privately, unfortunately. Existential therapy is hugely relevant to the world today and will be increasingly so worldwide in the future.
Hi Emmy, do you offer therapy via phone or video call?
Thank you kindly,
Speak to Ali Karem.
Hi Emmy, I’m french and very interesting by exsitential therapy. I’m a student in psychology and would like to be trained in existential therapy but I don’t find ine France a school or institut to do so.
Could you help me to find how to be traines in France in ET?
Thinks a lot and excuse my bad english. I will certainly progress…hope so!
I’m a french student in psychology and very interesting in existential psychoterapy approach. Your work interesting me a lot and the “british school”. But, I don’t find in France schools or institutions for training in existential phenomenological approach and, when I read books on these branche of existential approach I see nothing about France…
Could you give me some ideas on that? Is there schools or training in France? ….
Thinks and sorry for my so bad english!
Could you give an insight in to current thinking regarding developments in existential therapy? I’m wondering what the vision for its future is, considering perhaps its use in the NHS, moving away from CBT. Or do you see it being used as integratively with other modalities ?
An art therapist and friend of mine recommended I take a look at your work as she thought it might help me.
I’ve had specific counselling for childhood trauma, but have made myself suffer in a more general way for years.
During the last 30 hours or so I’ve been binge watching your videos. It resonates like nothing else ever has.
The idea that you can/should use anxiety to create positive outcomes, and not confuse it with fear is mind blowing. Hopefully I can address the crippling effects that this has had.
Thank you so much,
That’s wonderful to hear. Let me know in the comments of a video if you have a specific question you would like me to do a video on.